Criticism of police boycott in response to Kaepernick’s protest

*The following is an open letter directed at the Santa Clara Police Officer’s Association regarding their threat to boycott working as Levi Stadium security in response to Colin Kaepernick’s national anthem protest and his statements about Black oppression and police brutality. I understand this is a sensitive and emotional issue, however, my blog is a place for intelligent and productive discussion. I moderate all comments, and I will not approve comments to be published on this site that are hateful or vulgar in language.

I am not really big on sports. But I have been following the controversy around Colin Kaepernick’s decision to sit during the national anthem as a form of protest very closely. As Kaepernick said in his own words, “To me, this is bigger than football.”

I am new to San Francisco. I’ve only been here for a month now, and I’m only going to be here for a month longer. But for the time being, I live here. I work here. And honestly? I love this city more than I will ever love New York City, even though I was born and raised in the Empire State. I would hope that, regardless of my opinions, the Bay Area’s police officers would protect me. And now I feel uncertain about that.

The Santa Clara Police Officer’s Association (SCPAO) sent a letter to the San Francisco 49ers threatening that their members may boycott working at Levi Stadium if “corrective action” is not implemented for Kaepernick’s statements made about the issue of racism in American police departments and the loss of Black lives at the hands of officers. I am glad that someone like Kaepernick is bringing this issue up in a way that forces so many millions of people who would rather just ignore this problem to think about it.

Our nation’s law enforcement and emergency personnel are sworn to protect. There is no fine print. It’s not, “protect everyone… except those you don’t like.” Officers are not required to work at Levi Stadium, and when they do they are paid as security personnel. An individual officer has the right to pass up working at the stadium. But the fact that one would do that because they disagree with the views of one person in that stadium is alarming and petty. There seem to be plenty of officers who would step up and fill the empty positions. But what if there weren’t? Apparently, there are members of our law enforcement who would be okay with leaving a stadium of thousands of people defenseless.

In the SCPOA letter, and a similar letter from the San Francisco Police Officer’s Association (SFPOA), Kaepernick was accused of generalizing members of law enforcement and dismissing the daily struggles that police have to deal with.

Kaepernick never said Officer So-And-So and Officer Such-And-Such were racists. He never said ALL police officers are racist. He never said police officers have it easy, or that their job isn’t dangerous. He just pointed out that a problem exists. Apparently this was too much for members of SCPOA, as they say in their letter: Your employee further insulted all law enforcement officers in America by stating, ‘There is police brutality. People of color have been targeted by police.’” So, it’s insulting that Kaepernick pointed out something that has been proven to be true? Police brutality and racial profiling absolutely exist, and it’s not just a rare occurrence here and there. After lengthy investigations, police departments throughout the country have been found to have severe problems with systemic racism, including the San Francisco Police Department.

The SCPOA especially took issue with the following sentence that Kaepernick uttered to the media: “There are bodies in the street and people getting paid leave and getting away with murder.”

In the SCPOA letter, the sentence morphed, and became the following: “Your employee then insinuated that police officers are being placed on paid leave for murdering minorities,” and “Mr. Kaepernick again made the allegation that police officers are getting paid to murder people.”

No one is getting paid leave for killing a person of color. Kaepernick’s issue is that they’re getting paid leave despite having killed a person of color. You’ll notice Kaepernick used the word “and,” in his statement, not “for.” The SCPOA’s response to this sentence is overblown and entirely misses his point.

I agree with Kaepernick — it is deeply problematic that officers are on paid leave while under investigation for excessive force and even murder. Can you imagine a similar scenario happening in almost any other career field? When a school teacher comes under investigation for being sexually involved with a student, they lose their job before the verdict comes out. Same thing for a banker who is suspected of embezzlement, or a reporter who fabricated a story.

Police brutality and racism, both as separate entities and as an ugly tag-team, are issues that affect all of us. Across the county we are seeing police departments that are militarized and lacking in de-escalation tactics, resulting in fatalities when a better outcome could have been reached. And in terms of racism, the American spirit is to stand united despite our differences — if any group of people in this country are suffering because of who they are, we all have an obligation to stand up for them. As Dr. Martin Luther King said, “An injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.”

I have seen the effects of this at my own college community back at home in New York. Last year, our campus was in turmoil as the community called out Ithaca College’s campus safety officers and administration for its biased behaviors and decisions, causing many students of color on campus to feel unsafe. As hard as many privileged people in our community may have tried, it was impossible to ignore the voices of over a thousand protesters on our campus. Our college president, Tom Rochon, has since announced his early “retirement,” along with a slew of other campus administrators.

At the time I was the assistant news editor at our student newspaper, The Ithacan. We did a couple of in-depth pieces on horrifying encounters between students of color and campus safety officers. As a white student, I was shocked to hear stories of my Black classmates being stopped on campus in the middle of the night by officers who called their status as students into question, even when they were wearing Ithaca College clothing. I have been out on the campus at all hours of the night. Like many college students, there have been plenty of nights where I just didn’t go to bed. Regardless of whether I had “Ithaca College” plastered on every thread of clothing or no mention of my affiliation at all, my status as a student has never been questioned by an officer, and I can’t imagine a day (or night) where it would be. The sad truth is, my white face, in many situations, keeps me from being seen as a threat.

This problem is real. It’s happening on campuses. In cities. Out on the countryside. On the East Coast. The West Coast. And all of this is causing the public to lose trust in those we depend upon to protect us. I know that police do good. I know there are officers who go above and beyond every day, who put their lives on the line for the greater good. But still, my trust in them is almost completely gone because the reality of our “justice” system is one in which Black boys are shot for wearing hoodies and carrying Skittles, women are interrogated about what they were wearing and how much they drank after being raped, and their rapists only get six month sentences and then are released early, while others are spending years in jail for having possessed marijuana.

One night a few weeks ago, a Black man was pulled over on a bicycle just behind where my van was parked in Berkeley. He had apparently tried to run from the officers. My heart in my throat, I stayed awake and watched the whole interaction through a slit in my window blinds and listened closely to the conversation going on between the man and the officers. I was painfully aware that I might be the only witness who could stand up for this man in court if the situation escalated and he ended up dead. I was relieved when the officers eventually let him go after searching his person and his backpack.

Any officers who choose to participate in a boycott of defending Levi Stadium are proving all the things they hate about Kaepernick’s opinion right. They are proving that there is indeed a limit to who they are willing to protect. They are giving the public more reasons to be distrustful, skeptical, and uncomfortable around law enforcement. In a time when we need them to step up, they are instead turning their backs on us.

Thankfully, Michael Sellers, chief of the Santa Clara Police Department, has called for his officers to put citizen safety first. While Sellers also expressed disappointment in Kaepernick’s choices and words, he affirmed that the police need to do their duty anyway. “As distasteful as [Kaepernick’s] actions are, these actions are protected by the Constitution. Police officers are here to protect the rights of every person, even if we disagree with their position. Police officers have sworn an oath to uphold the Constitution.”

Imagine that: someone respectfully disagreeing, and then moving on. I hope members of SCPOA will heed their chief’s words.

I want to close this letter by saying I am sick to death of the idea so many people seem to have that if you stand with Black Lives Matter, then you are also anti-cop. This idea is ridiculous. Social justice activists want everyone to be safe, including officers, in the same way feminists want equality for all, including men. We want measures to be put in place to prevent racism and other forms of discrimination from influencing the actions of those who should be protecting us. We also want to see all of our men and women who are in service for the general public come home safe to their families each day.

Absolutely no one deserves to lose their loved ones to a premature, preventable tragedy, whether they had black skin or a blue uniform.

Thank you for reading. A shortened version of this letter was published in The Ithacan on Sept. 7, 2016. You can read that version here.

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Criticism of police boycott in response to Kaepernick’s protest

  1. OK, so let me get this straight, you think it is incumbent upon good cops to VOLUNTEER to go to a venue where they will be disrespected and called all sorts of nasty names by a spoiled athlete (I guess you missed the story about his pig socks) when said service is not a requirement of their job. I wonder how long YOU would last at your job if someone there was calling you foul names like “racist” and “murderer” all day every day. My guess is that you wouldn’t put up with it very long. Refusing to do extra work in an environment where you will be baselessly attacked doesn’t prove Kaepernick right. It is nothing more than the officers exercising the same constitutional rights you seem to think apply to everyone but the cops.

    Ideally what should happen is when he disrespects the flag and the sacrifices of all those who made his childish antics possible, that the fans would wait until the anthem finishes and then leave the stadium. If they were to voice their support for the police just one time, the NFL would put an end to his insulting behavior. Unfortunately, there are too many people like you whose support for law enforcement amounts to nothing more than empty words belied by your actions.

    You cite his vague references to the police as if that somehow means that he is not calling ALL cops racists and murderers. You are exactly wrong. His failure to identify the specific instances he is talking about and instead speak in generalities of a systemic racism (that, your citation to the now discredited Gawker notwithstanding, does not exist) is precisely an attack on all cops everywhere.

    You even parrot this lie in your piece. You do realize that there is more than one police department in this country right? Even if Gawker was telling the truth for once and some members of SFPD sent some crude jokes, that doesn’t mean a) the officers sending them were racists; b) even if they were the entire department was racist or condoned racism; or c) that the emails prove the cops targeted blacks. Have you ever noticed that a lot of these “poor black boys” “murdered by police” have lengthy criminal records and/or were engaged in criminal conduct near or even at the time they were killed?

    Tamir Rice: pointed a realistic looking BB gun at people in a park that prompted 9-1-1 calls and went for it as officers rode up.
    Michael Brown: strong armed robbery of a convenience store, actively attacked the officer who eventually shot him.
    Alton Sterling: convicted child molester and, as a felon, illegally carrying a gun at the time he was killed.

    and on and on and on. And with the same frequency, people like you and these spoiled rich athletes support the CRIMINAL and not the cop who was forced to deal with him. We would not know ANY of their names had they simply complied with the officers’ instructions and/or refrained from fighting the police.

    Were what these spoiled rich ingrates doing merely spewing words it would be bad enough. You learn to let people call you the most awful racist names and shrug it off. But this false narrative he and those of you who support him are spinning is costing police officers — and civilians — their lives. You play lip service to those in blue making it home safe while simultaneous repeating the false narrative that cops are out of control racists hell-bent on killing innocent black boys. It is this exact narrative that was cited just days ago by a shooter in Philadelphia. He seriously injured two police officers, but KILLED a civilian.

    http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/philly-cops-shot-conditions-unknown-suspect-custody-42154906

    Hands up don’t shoot was based on a LIE as proven by a state grand jury and a subsequent DOJ investigation. The officers involved in the Freddie Gray incident (some of whom were black themselves) served under a BLACK mayor, a BLACK police chief, were prosecuted by a BLACK state’s attorney, and acquitted by a BLACK judge. More generally speaking, there are hundreds of thousand if not millions of citizen/police encounters every year that do not end in a shooting or even someone going to jail. Around 400 people are killed by police officers every year. Of these, nearly ALL of them are justified. In fact, the notorious “mappingpoliceviolence” website pointed out that last year there were only 10 prosecutions and 2 convictions. Whether you like it or not, innocent until proven guilty applies to cops as well as civilians.

    Whether you believe it or not, the system works most of the time and in a color-blind fashion. Grand juries and petit juries are composed of persons from every conceivable background. You can hold your breath and plug your ears, but our system is based upon citizens hearing the evidence and making a decision. Those citizens see and hear evidence that you do not, and unless you want to accuse all the black jurors and judges of being racists, your opinion on the system being racist is not supported by the facts.

    I’ll close this by taking your closing head on. You cannot be for BLM and the police at the same time. These are people who have been recorded chanting “Pigs in a blanket fry ’em like bacon” and “What do want? Dead cops. When do we want it? Now” at their rallies and protests. They have called for the deaths of police officers.

    And there have been too many that have acted on their battle cry:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/09/us/dallas-police-shooting.html?_r=0

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2884164/Pictured-way-murder-two-police-Detectives-reveal-picture-cop-killer-Ismaaiyl-Brinsley-admit-no-idea-did-attack.html
    (pay particularly close attention to his tweet and the number of likes it received)

    There is simply no way to be for BLM and for the people they want dead at the same time.

    It isn’t the cops who need to step up. The people who need to step up are people like you. You need to step up and support law enforcement instead of the criminals they protect you from and realize that BLM is not helping one bit.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s